Home > Semiconductor > The GlobalFoundries Enigma

The GlobalFoundries Enigma

When AMD sought to shed its costly manufacturing unit Ibrahim Ajami saw an interesting opportunity, one that will eventually bring semiconductor manufacturing to Abu Dhabi. Let’s start with the recent interview published with Ajami, the 34 year old Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC), which is owned by the Government of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, and is the controlling shareholder of GlobalFoundries (GFI).

GlobalFoundries wants 30% of the made-to-order chip market within three years. “Am I setting very aggressive targets? Yes,” Ajami said in a Jan 28 interview in Abu Dhabi. “We need to be a $5 billion company in the next two to three years.”  A 30% share would take GlobalFoundries well past United Microelectronics Corp (UMC), making it the world’s second-largest contract manufacturer of chips after Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC).

Mr. Ajami also dispelled recent rumors: “ATIC won’t buy the rest of GlobalFoundries (AMD owns 34%) and the company has no interest in acquiring either United Micro or South Korea’s Hynix Semiconductor Inc.”, Ajami said. “It doesn’t fit with our strategy right now,” he said. “UMC is another foundry in Taiwan and we’re not looking to go there right now and Hynix is a memory company. Memory is not what we’re focused on right now”.

Ajami earned his BS degree from Northeastern University in Boston in 1998 and his MBA from the University of Southern California in 2004. His semiconductor experience comes from the creation of a Silicon Valley startup called ViralSounds Inc., and he worked for Packard Bell/NEC. Ajami, associate director of the acquisitions unit of Mubadala, was tapped to become CEO of ATIC and led the $7.5 billion acquisitions of AMD manufacturing and Chartered Semiconductor that we now call GlobalFoundries.

As I mentioned in TSMC versus GlobalFoundries Part I and Part II, GFI will compete head-to-head with TSMC in the first source semiconductor market, while UMC and SMIC are content to be second and third source semiconductor manufacturers. GFI has not been shy about their challenge to TSMC’s wafer supremacy and TSMC has responded in kind by increasing capital expenditures, increasing R&D expenses, and hiring thousands of engineers:

DanielNenni TSMC plans record $4.8bn investment http://tinyurl.com/ygxe334 Morris Chang does not see supply exceeding demand

DanielNenni TSMCs R&D expenses rising 25 pct this yr http://tinyurl.com/ylzkk3b R&D to hit $850 million in 2010

DanielNenni TSMC to add 3k+ engineers +13% headcount http://tinyurl.com/yhtmvpp to do battle with Global Foundries

During my January visit to Taiwan there was definitely excitement in the air at TSMC. The Fab lobbies were filled with job applicants, the Fab cafeterias and coffee shops were abuzz, and meetings were much harder to coordinate, a very big change from a few months ago. On a side note, the food in Fab 12 is by far the tastiest and EVA Airlines is the absolute best carrier from the US to Taiwan, but I digress.

Whether or not GFI is a serious threat to TSMC’s foundry supremacy, TSMC is certainly using GFI’s public relations activities to motivate employees.  Déjà vu when the deep pockets of the Chinese government funded SMIC. Unfortunately, as it turned out, SMIC was a sheep in wolf’s clothing. GFI on the other hand looks more like a wolf in an Armani suit.

  1. February 8, 2010 at 1:51 AM | #1

    Hi, this is a very interesting article about how the global foundries are forging ahead. I liked the part about GlobalFoundries target of 30% of the made-to-order chip market within three years.

  2. MrShephard
    February 8, 2010 at 9:45 AM | #2

    I’ve been sharing notes with a colleague, it simply takes three years from investing a dollar to this becoming revenue in the foundry business. If GFI wanted 30% share in 2-3 years time they should have started at least a year ago right? A 30% share in even 5 years time would be a very big ask.

  3. February 8, 2010 at 3:57 PM | #3

    The emergence of GlobalFoundries is one of the most exciting and promising events on the semiconductor landscape – I certainly wish them well. However, there seem to be serious weaknesses in the management structure. I have analyzed TSMC in my strategic marketing function in endless detail. TSMC team has demonstrated again and again that it is superb in analyzing competition and pinpointing and acting decisively and fast on identified competitive weaknesses. I hope that Messrs. Kupec and Grose, and especially the ATIC team, are starting to realize the danger of the situation.
    Boris Petrov
    http://www.petrovgroup.com

  4. February 16, 2010 at 9:20 AM | #4

    I am receiving a flood of inquiries about my comment on GF – the new entity which has a potential to fundamentally influence the evolution of IC industry. So here are some of clarifications:

    It is very likely that IBM will transfer/sell its IC fabrication capabilities into GF – certainly a significant step in IC industry’s evolution. The reasons are fairly obvious.

    In ICs, and elsewhere, IBM is a premier research and engineering services company. IBM’s research has been a fountain of basic invention, often of entire businesses and industries — IBM is America’s national asset in that sense (see some of PG analyses of IBM on the Prior Work Web page).

    By now IBM is about $100B systems and service (and profitable) company; its challenge is how to become a $200B within a decade or so. IBM’s unparalleled $3B Research Division will continue to drive IBM’s evolution — and of the IC industry beyond silicon.

    Is it really prudent that the future of the entire semiconductor industry and, more importantly, that GF leadership should include executives responsible for a demonstrated string of strategic failures in acquired foundry — while key technical, sales, and other star executives of that same foundry are “gone”? It is probable that GF’s key customer CEOs already have serious concerns….

  5. February 20, 2010 at 3:51 PM | #5

    * Group: TSMC Connect
    * Subject: New comment (1) on “The GlobalFoundries Enigma”

    TSMC’s business model has always been to be the premier dedicated contract manufacturing source for the semiconductor industry. Their gateway to new business depends on their ability to outperform everyone else in the world at cost effective manufacturing. They are the best in the world.

    Global Foundry’s business model seems different. Their gateway to new business depends on their expertise at collaborating with customers on designing new chips. Customers are far more interested in being first to market with innovative new products than emphasizing cost effective manufacturing on existing products. Having said that, locating manufacturing in Abu Dhabi seems less critical.
    Posted by David Schoof schoofds@yahoo.com

  1. No trackbacks yet.